Dodge Charger 2024 3.6L GT vs Han L EV 701 Standard Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Daily Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 397.27
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
210
/
6
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5
5040
5050
1905
1960
1479
1505
3052
2970
455
/
Fuel Economy
9.3
/
70
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
DHT
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
/
Wheels/brakes
/
245/45 R19
/
245/45 R19
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
3.6 L
/
Gasoline
Electric
300 BHP
680 BHP
358
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
