Duster 1.6L PE (4x2) 2025 vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 50960
SAR 149327
SAR 49000
SAR 143635
SAR 686
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
161 km/h
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
16
/
4341 mm
4760 mm
1804 mm
1930 mm
1693 mm
1927 mm
2676 mm
2750 mm
414 L
400 L
/
5 Doors
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
17.2 Km/L
10 Km/L
50 L
75 L
17.2 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
Front Driver And Passenger Airbags.Passenger Airbag With Disconnecting Function.
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
115 BHP
224 BHP
156 Nm
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
