E300 3.0L vs City DX 1.5L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Price Comparison
SAR 462649
SAR 72068
SAR 445141
SAR 69339
SAR 6227
SAR 970
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 16.17
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.76
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 113.19
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 82.32
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 485.1
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 352.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5902.05
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4292.4
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
2998 cc
1490 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
4949 mm
4553 mm
1880 mm
1748 mm
1480 mm
1476 mm
2961 mm
2650 mm
540 L
/
Fuel Economy
9 Km/L
13 Km/L
66 L
40 L
9 Km/L
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
3.0 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
None
4
4
285 BHP
119 BHP
420 Nm
145 Nm
