ES 300h vs Volvo S90 2023 T5 FWD Inscription Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Luxurious and refined interior design
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Smooth and comfortable driving performance
Negative
- Narrow rear cargo space
- The infotainment system is relatively old
- A higher price than competitors in the same category
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 205723
TBD
SAR 197915
TBD
SAR 2769
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 244.65
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 244.65
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
230
4
4
2490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4975 mm
4963
1865 mm
2019
1445 mm
1443
2870 mm
2941
/
382
/
/
Fuel Economy
15 Km/L
14.9
50 L
55
15 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
✓
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
10
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
E-CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.5 L
2.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
214 BHP
254 BHP
356 Nm
350
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
