FORTUNER GX2 4X2 vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong off-road performance
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Reliability and well known Toyota quality
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- Outdated internal technology
- Less stability at high speeds
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 128751
SAR 149327
SAR 123855
SAR 143635
SAR 1733
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
17
/
4
5 Doors
4795
4760 mm
1855
1930 mm
1835
1927 mm
/
2750 mm
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
10.3
10 Km/L
80
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Fabric
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
Driver & Front Passenger + Driver Knee
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
8
12.3
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
✓
/
6
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Rear Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.7 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
164 BHP
224 BHP
245
387 Nm
91
/
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
