CarteaCompare CarsGT 1.5T COM vs 03+ 2.0T AT 4WD Hyper Plus

GT 1.5T COM vs 03+ 2.0T AT 4WD Hyper Plus Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Attractive sporty design
  • Good fuel efficiency
  • Advanced technical features

Negative

  • Limited background space
  • Less acceleration compared to some competitors
  • Limited engine options

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Price Comparison

SAR 73546

SAR 142496

SAR 70730

SAR 137080

SAR 990

SAR 1918

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.06 L/KM

0.07 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

SAR 8.82

Daily Fule Payment

SAR 10.29

Weekly Fule Payment

SAR 61.74

Weekly Fule Payment

SAR 72.03

Monthly Fule Payment

SAR 264.6

Monthly Fule Payment

SAR 308.7

Yearly Fule Payment

SAR 3219.3

Yearly Fule Payment

SAR 3755.85

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

9.4

5.7

Engine / Motor

190

250

/

4

Dimensions

5

5

1539

/

18

/

4 Doors

/

4571

4697

1855

1843

1719

1448

2708

2730

430

/

145

/

Fuel Economy

16.9 Km/L

14.3

55

/

16.9 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

Dual

/

/

/

front row seats

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

2

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

14.1

/

/

/

/

6

/

/

Transmission

7DCT

Automatic

/

Chassis & Steering

Front Drive

All Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

/

225/50 R18

/

225/50 R18

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

1.5

2.0 L

Gasoline

Gasoline

171

265 BHP

275

380

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

MG | GT 1.5T COM

VS

Changan | Eado Plus Limited

MG | GT 1.5T COM

VS

Nissan | Nissan Sunny 2018 1.5 SL

MG | GT 1.5T COM

VS

Kia | Kia Cerato 2018 1.6L Base

MG | GT 1.5T COM

VS

Kia | Kia Cerato 2018 1.6L LX

MG | GT 1.5T COM

VS

Renault | Renault Megane 2020 1.6L LE+

MG Related Car

Lynk & Co Related Car

MG Related New Car