H6 Active vs T1 i-DM Standard Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern interior and exterior design
- High fuel efficiency;
- Advanced security technologies
Negative
- Mediocre engine performance at high speeds
- The comfort of the seats is not optimal for long distances
- Availability of spare parts may be limited in some areas
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 95320
SAR 152676
SAR 91698
SAR 146880
SAR 1283
SAR 2055
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.05 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.29
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 7.35
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 72.03
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 51.45
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 308.7
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 220.5
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3755.85
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2682.75
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
1499
Dimensions
5
5
/
2000
/
5
/
4705
/
1967
/
1843
/
2800
/
574
/
160
Fuel Economy
14.9 km/L
18.5
/
70
Comfort
✓
/
Yes
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
10.25 Inch
15.6"
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
10.25"
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
4
/
No
✓
es
✓
Yes
✓
Yes
✓
Yes
✓
Yes
✓
Yes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
8 + DTS
9
/
✓
/
✓
Battery/Charging
/
0.5
Transmission
7DCT
1DHT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
/
/
MacPherson
/
Electric Powered
Wheels/brakes
225/60 R18
235/60 R19
225/60 R18
235/60 R19
/
Ventilated
/
Disc
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
/
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
1.5
Gasoline
Hybrid
Turbocharge
/
Turbocharged
/
4
/
DOHC
/
201 HP @ 6000-6300 rpm
335
105
/
320 Nm @ 1500-4000 rpm
530
Technologies
Yes
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Yes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
310
/
LiFePO4 Battery
/
Permanent magnet synchronous motor
/
150
/
P3
