Tank 300 Conqueror HEV vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 164639
SAR 149327
SAR 158394
SAR 143635
SAR 2216
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.29
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 14.7
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 72.03
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 102.9
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 308.7
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 441
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3755.85
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5365.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
1998 cc
Chinese
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4760 mm
4760 mm
1930 mm
1930 mm
1927 mm
1927 mm
2750 mm
2750 mm
400 L
400 L
224 m
224 m
Fuel Economy
15 Km/L
10 Km/L
75 L
75 L
15 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Driver Seat
/
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
✓
/
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Standard
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12.3
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
9
9
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
2.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
342 BHP
224 BHP
648 Nm
387 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
