Honda CR-V 2024 2.4 EX vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- High reliability and durable performance
- A wide range of security technologies
- Excellent fuel efficiency
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Lack of hybrid drive options in some markets
- Limited charging capacity compared to some competitors
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
SAR 182767
TBD
SAR 175835
TBD
SAR 2460
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.09 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.13
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 63.91
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 314.55
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 273.9
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3332.45
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200
/
/
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4550
5115
1820
1980
1680
1920
2620
/
1053
/
Fuel Economy
11.0
9.3
58
110
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Safety
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Infotainment
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✔
Wheels/brakes
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Engine
2.4 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Diesel
188 BHP
304 BHP
222
700
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✔
✓
✔
✓
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
