HR-V SPORT vs MG RX8 2023 2.0T STD (AWD) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Flexible interior design and practical space
- Fuel efficiency and economical maintenance
- Driving comfort and good wheelbase adjustment
Negative
- Insufficient engine performance in some cases
- The quality of interior materials needs to be improved
- Standard equipment is limited in basic categories
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 150528
SAR 111436
SAR 144840
SAR 107180
SAR 2026
SAR 1500
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
1498cc
/
Dimensions
5
7 Seater
1287
/
17 英寸
/
4398
4923
1790
1930
1590
1810
2610
2850
196
/
Fuel Economy
40
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Naturally Aspirated
/
1.5L i-VTEC
/
4
/
10.6:1
/
DOHC IN VTC+IN-VTEC
/
119
220 BHP
87.7
/
6600
/
145
360
4300
/
i-VTEC
/
PGM-FI 电喷
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
