HR-V SPORT vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2023 3.5L 3 Door mid Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Flexible interior design and practical space
- Fuel efficiency and economical maintenance
- Driving comfort and good wheelbase adjustment
Negative
- Insufficient engine performance in some cases
- The quality of interior materials needs to be improved
- Standard equipment is limited in basic categories
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 150528
TBD
SAR 144840
TBD
SAR 2026
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.13 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.15
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 106.02
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 469.5
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5527.93
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
1498cc
/
/
180
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
1287
/
17 英寸
/
4398
4385
1790
1875
1590
1850
2610
2560
196
/
/
500
Fuel Economy
40
69
/
7.7
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
✓
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
4.2
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
Front
/
√
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
√
✓
✓
/
✓
/
√
✓
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
✓
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
√
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
√
/
CVT
/
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
/
225/50 R18
/
225/50 R18
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
√
✓
√
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
1.5
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Naturally Aspirated
/
1.5L i-VTEC
/
4
/
10.6:1
/
DOHC IN VTC+IN-VTEC
/
119
184 BHP
87.7
/
6600
/
145
303
4300
/
i-VTEC
/
PGM-FI 电喷
/
Technologies
√
/
√
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
√
/
/
✓
