HS3 1.5T Luxury vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 117380
SAR 149327
SAR 112900
SAR 143635
SAR 1580
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 7.35
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 14.7
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 51.45
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 102.9
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 220.5
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 441
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2682.75
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5365.5
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
195
200 km/h
4
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4655
4760 mm
1900
1930 mm
1668
1927 mm
2770
2750 mm
/
5 Doors
/
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
18.7
10 Km/L
/
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
8
9
/
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
Transmission
7DCT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
235/55R18
/
235/55R18
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5T
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Direct Injection+Turbo Charging
/
166 BHP
224 BHP
258
387 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
