Cerato 1.6L LX vs Mazda 6 2018 2.5 S Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Stylish and distinctive exterior design
- Low fuel consumption
- Advanced technical system
Negative
- Limited storage space
- Lower engine capacity compared to competitors
- Less efficient sound insulation on highways
Positive
- Stylish and modern exterior design
- High internal manufacturing quality
- Great driving and control fun
Negative
- The back space may be tight
- The suspension system can be harsh on off road
- The interface of some technologies needs improvements
Price Comparison
SAR 84398
SAR 87220
SAR 81188
SAR 83900
SAR 1136
SAR 1174
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.29
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.76
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 72.03
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 82.32
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 308.7
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 352.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3755.85
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4292.4
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
220
4
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4640
4.850
1800
1.840
1440
1.450
2700
2.830
427
419
/
✓
Fuel Economy
14.9
12.2
53
62
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Engine
1.6 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Petrol
128 BHP
188 BHP
154
256
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Motor
/
N/A
