McLaren 650S 2016 Coupe vs Nissan GT-R 2023 Black Edition Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Powerful engine performance, suitable for high acceleration
- Excellent control and stability when driving fast
- Bold and attractive exterior design
Negative
- Purchase and maintenance costs are high
- Relatively poor fuel economy
- Ride comfort is limited by suspension stiffness
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.12 L/KM
0.12 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.98
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.98
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 97.86
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 97.86
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 419.4
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 419.4
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5102.7
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5102.7
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
/
2.8
Engine / Motor
333
315
8
6
Dimensions
2 Seater
4 Seater
4512
4710
2093
1895
1203
1370
2670
2780
/
249
Fuel Economy
8.5
8.5
72
72
Comfort
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Rear Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
3.8 L
3.8 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
640 BHP
565 BHP
678
637
Technologies
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
