Nissan GT-R 2024 Premium-copy vs Mercedes-Benz AMG GT 2023 4.0L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Powerful engine performance, suitable for high acceleration
- Excellent control and stability when driving fast
- Bold and attractive exterior design
Negative
- Purchase and maintenance costs are high
- Relatively poor fuel economy
- Ride comfort is limited by suspension stiffness
Positive
- Powerful engine performance and excellent driving interaction
- Sporty and luxurious exterior design draws attention
- High-end interior quality and advanced driving technologies
Negative
- High price and large maintenance costs
- Limited driving comfort on normal roads
- Limited space for passengers and luggage
Price Comparison
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.12 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 13.98
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 97.86
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 419.4
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 314.55
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5102.7
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
2.8
4.0
Engine / Motor
315
304
6
/
Dimensions
4 Seater
2 Seater
4710
4546
1895
1939
1370
1288
2780
2630
249
285
Fuel Economy
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Engine
3.8 L
4.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
565 BHP
469 BHP
637
630
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
