Nissan Kicks 2024 1.6 SL + NIM + Brown vs T01 Adventurer Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and trend compliant design
- High fuel economy for efficiency
- Effective use of internal space
Negative
- Engine performance is limited
- Slow transmission response
- The quality of interior materials is average
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 102976
SAR 127048
SAR 99078
SAR 122237
SAR 1386
SAR 1710
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.64
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.84
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 60.48
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 110.88
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 241.92
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 443.52
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3153.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5781.6
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
180
/
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4295
4705
1760
1895
1590
1936
2620
2860
432
/
/
2150
/
17"
/
1598
/
1598
/
235
/
40
/
36
/
23.6
Fuel Economy
15.4
9.1
41
80
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
10.25-inch
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
12.3-inch
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
Automatic
8AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four-Wheel Drive
/
5-Link Rigid Axle Suspension
/
5-Link Rigid Axle Suspension
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
كهربائي
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.6 L
2.0L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
248 BHP
149
410
/
Turbocharge
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
• Standard • Economic • Sport • Snow • Sand • Rock • Mud • Wade • Mountain • Uneven
/
✓
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)