Nissan Pathfinder 2023 3.5L S 2WD vs ZS 1.5L STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Spacious interior space and flexible storage
- Comfortable seating and luxurious driving experience
- Comprehensive and advanced security equipment
Negative
- Medium fuel economy
- Traditional interior design needs updating
- Noticeable noise during high speeds
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
SAR 172660
SAR 57134
SAR 166099
SAR 54970
SAR 2324
SAR 769
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.84
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.64
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 110.88
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 60.48
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 475.2
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 259.2
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5781.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3153.6
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
190
170
6
/
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
5046
4323
1975
1809
1795
1653
2900
2585
470
359/1166
/
1318
/
17
/
5
/
145
Fuel Economy
9.4
17.2
74
45
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
Interior
✓
Front Row Seats
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
10.1
/
✓
/
4
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Drive
/
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
3.5 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
271 BHP
118 BHP
340
180
/
88
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
