PATROL XE vs ZS 1.5L STD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Outstanding off-road performance
- Outstanding engine power
- Spacious and luxurious interior design
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Slow electronic system response
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Price Comparison
SAR 254548
SAR 57134
SAR 244937
SAR 54970
SAR 3426
SAR 769
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
170
Dimensions
8 Seater
5 Seater
18
17
5350
4323
2030
1809
1945
1653
3075
2585
244
145
/
1318
/
5
/
359/1166
Fuel Economy
/
17.2
97
45
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Key
Smart Key
Manual
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
12.3
/
✓
/
Monolith Display
/
Cloth
Fabric
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Front+Side+Curtain+Driver Knee
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
10.1
✓
/
6
4
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
✓
/
9
/
9 SPEED AUTOMATIC
CVT
Chassis & Steering
✓
/
Electric Power Steering
/
/
Front Drive
/
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
Wheels/brakes
Disc
Disc
Disc
Disc
265/70 R18
215/55 R17
265/70 R18
215/55 R17
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
Engine
3.8 L
1.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
3.8-LITER DOHC, V6, CVTCS DIG ENGINE
/
316 BHP
118 BHP
386
180
/
88
Technologies
✓
✓
ROCK, SAND, ECO, MUD, STANDARD, SPORT
/
Auto
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
