Qin L 80KM Lead vs City DX 1.5L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Price Comparison
TBD
SAR 72068
TBD
SAR 69339
TBD
SAR 970
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.04 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.88
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.76
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 41.16
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 82.32
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 176.4
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 352.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2146.2
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4292.4
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
/
4 Doors
/
4553 mm
/
1748 mm
/
1476 mm
/
2650 mm
Fuel Economy
25
13 Km/L
/
40 L
/
13 Km/L
Transmission
E-CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
101 BHP
119 BHP
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
/
145 Nm
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
