Qin Plus FWD vs City DX 1.5L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Spacious and comfortable interior
- Low fuel consumption and economical
- High manufacturing quality and reliability
Negative
- Engine performance is limited at high speeds
- Lack of some modern technical features
- Sound insulation from the outside may be poor
Price Comparison
SAR 94500
SAR 72068
SAR 90900
SAR 69339
SAR 1272
SAR 970
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.04 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.88
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.76
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 41.16
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 82.32
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 176.4
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 352.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2146.2
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4292.4
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
185
200 km/h
/
4
/
1490 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
Flush Door
/
5
5 Seater
1500
/
17
/
4
4 Doors
4765
4553 mm
1837
1748 mm
1495
1476 mm
2720
2650 mm
500
/
Fuel Economy
26
13 Km/L
48
40 L
/
13 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Interior
8.8
/
LCD
/
Front Row Seats
/
Sensatec Leather
/
✓
/
Dual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Driver's and Passenger airbags, Front-row side airbag
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Row
/
Infotainment
10.1-inch rotating screen
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Battery/Charging
6.6
/
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson
/
Torsion Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Ventilated Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
Manual
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5 L
1.5 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
Plug in Hybrid
/
197 BHP
119 BHP
325
145 Nm
/
In-Line
/
None
/
4
Motor
145
/
325
/
1
/
Lithium iron phosphate battery
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport, Ordinary, Economical
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
