RX 350h Platinum 2.5L vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Luxury design and high quality
- Good fuel efficiency
- Advanced technology and amenities
Negative
- The price is high for some competitors
- Limited back-end storage space
- Less sharp control compared to some sports cars
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 344968
SAR 149327
SAR 331937
SAR 143635
SAR 4643
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 252.81
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
260 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
2490 cc
1998 cc
GCC
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4890 mm
4760 mm
1920 mm
1930 mm
1695 mm
1927 mm
2850 mm
2750 mm
350 L
400 L
160 m
224 m
Fuel Economy
15 Km/L
10 Km/L
65 L
75 L
15 Km/L
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
14
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
21
9
Transmission
/
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.5
2.0 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
None
Single Turbo
4
4
246 BHP
224 BHP
315 Nm
387 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
