T1 Comfort 2026 vs Atto 8 Premium FWD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Strong performance in its price category
- Spacious and comfortable interior
Negative
- Fuel economy can be improved
- Limited options for the entertainment system
- A less widespread agent network
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 112560
SAR 163080
SAR 108300
SAR 156900
SAR 1515
SAR 2195
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.03 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 4.41
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 30.87
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 132.3
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 1609.65
Hide common specs
Car Information
Dimensions
5
5
4705
5040
1967
1996
1843
1760
2800
2950
1690
/
1700
/
574
/
199
165 mm
/
20
/
5.9 M
Fuel Economy
/
34.7
70
60
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
Front Row Seats
/
10.25
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
PU
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Rear
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Driver's & Passenger's Airbag/ Farside Airbag/Front & Rear Side Airbags/Integrated Side Air Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
15.6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
10
Battery/Charging
/
40
Transmission
8AT
AT
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Drive
MacPherson
Double Wishbone Type
Multi-link
Five-link
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Disc
/
235/60 R19
255/50 R20
235/60 R19
255/50 R20
Exterior
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
1.5
Gasoline
Hybrid
254
275
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Sport / Normal / Eco
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
