T1 Comfort 2026 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2023 3.5L 3 Door mid Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Strong performance in its price category
- Spacious and comfortable interior
Negative
- Fuel economy can be improved
- Limited options for the entertainment system
- A less widespread agent network
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 112560
TBD
SAR 108300
TBD
SAR 1515
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.13 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 18.72
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 131.04
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 561.6
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 6832.8
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
4705
4385
1967
1875
1843
1850
2800
2560
1690
/
1700
/
574
500
199
/
Fuel Economy
/
7.7
70
69
Comfort
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Rear
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
8AT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
MacPherson
/
Multi-link
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Disc
/
235/60 R19
/
235/60 R19
/
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
254
184 BHP
/
303
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
