Land Cruiser Prado 2.8T TXL-2 Diesel vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2023 3.5L 3 Door mid Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Strong performance in rough terrain
- Reliability and durability
- Spacious and comfortable interior
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High maintenance and repair costs
- Traditional interior design
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 233070
TBD
SAR 224250
TBD
SAR 3137
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.13 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.81
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.15
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 40.67
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 106.02
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 180.11
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 469.5
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2120.65
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5527.93
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
180
Dimensions
7 Seater
5 Seater
18
/
5005
4385
1980
1875
1992
1850
/
2560
/
500
Fuel Economy
14.1
7.7
110
69
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front Doors
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
7
/
Front Row Seats
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
Synthethic Leather
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Dual
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Front Airbags Driver & Passenger + D&P Knee + Side + Curtain
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Central
✓
8-Speed Automatic Transmission
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Full Time 4WD with Transfer Case (HI/LOW)
/
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R18
/
265/65 R18
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.8
3.5 L
Diesel
Gasoline
201
184 BHP
500
303
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
