UNI-K Limited 2025 vs 300 Challenger 2.0T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Price Comparison
SAR 146887
SAR 149327
SAR 141335
SAR 143635
SAR 1977
SAR 2010
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200
200 km/h
1998 mL
1998 cc
/
4
/
Chinese
Dimensions
5
5 Seater
21
/
5
5 Doors
4865
4760 mm
1948
1930 mm
1690
1927 mm
2890
2750 mm
518-1412
400 L
/
224 m
Fuel Economy
12.6
10 Km/L
70
75 L
/
10 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Key
Keyless Entry
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
3.5 inch TFT10.25+TFT9.2+ inch TFT
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Front Row Seats
/
TFT
/
Driver Seat
/
Leather
Leather
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
Safety
6
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
12.3
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Android LCD
✓
/
12
9
SONY
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
AT
/
8
/
8-Speed Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
MacPherson Independent
/
Multi-Link Independent
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
265/45 R21
/
265/45 R21
/
✓
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
LED
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
2.0L Turbo GDI
/
4
4
DOHC
/
233 BHP
224 BHP
5500
/
390
387 Nm
3300
/
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
Motor
Transverse
/
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
