ZR-V EX 2024 vs Changan CS95 2023 2.0T Classic (7-Seater) FWD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Comfortable and practical interior design
- Good fuel efficiency
- Advanced security technologies and systems
Negative
- Luggage capacity is somewhat limited
- Pricing may be higher than competitors
- Modest engine performance compared to some competitors
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 158847
SAR 114637
SAR 152835
SAR 110285
SAR 2138
SAR 1543
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 252.81
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
4
/
185
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4567
4949
1840
1930
1621
1790
2657
2810
Fuel Economy
14.7
10.5
57
74
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
❌
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
12
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
✓
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
180BHP
233 BHP
240
360
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
