ZR-V EX 2024 vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Comfortable and practical interior design
- Good fuel efficiency
- Advanced security technologies and systems
Negative
- Luggage capacity is somewhat limited
- Pricing may be higher than competitors
- Modest engine performance compared to some competitors
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
SAR 143317
TBD
SAR 137885
TBD
SAR 1929
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.13
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 63.91
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 252.81
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 283.03
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3332.45
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
4567
5115
1840
1980
1621
1920
2657
/
Fuel Economy
14.7
9.3
57
110
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
❌
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
12
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
✓
/
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
All Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
/
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Diesel
180BHP
304 BHP
240
700
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
