ZS 1.5L STD vs HS 2.0T Comfort Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 57134
SAR 83945
SAR 54970
SAR 80722
SAR 769
SAR 1130
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.76
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 82.32
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 264.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 352.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4292.4
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
210 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
/
4323
4574 mm
1809
1876 mm
1653
1685 mm
2585
2720 mm
359/1166
463 L
145
/
Fuel Economy
17.2
12.2 Km/L
45
55 L
/
12.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
231 BHP
88
/
180
360 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
