ZS 1.5L STD vs Mitsubishi Pajero 2023 3.5L 3 Door mid Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 57134
TBD
SAR 54970
TBD
SAR 769
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.13 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 15.15
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 106.02
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 209.7
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 454.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5527.93
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
180
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
/
4323
4385
1809
1875
1653
1850
2585
2560
359/1166
500
145
/
Fuel Economy
17.2
7.7
45
69
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
✓
Fabric
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
118 BHP
184 BHP
88
/
180
303
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
