ZS 1.5L STD vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
SAR 57134
TBD
SAR 54970
TBD
SAR 769
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.13
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 63.91
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 283.03
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3332.45
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
/
/
6
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
/
4323
5115
1809
1980
1653
1920
2585
/
359/1166
/
145
/
Fuel Economy
17.2
9.3
45
110
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Fabric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
✓
✓
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
All Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Diesel
118 BHP
304 BHP
88
/
180
700
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
