ZS 1.5T LUX vs HS 2.0T Comfort Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Modern and attractive exterior design
- Economical fuel consumption
- Competitive price compared to specifications
Negative
- Average interior material quality
- Engine performance is limited by power
- The lack of some advanced security systems
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
TBD
SAR 83945
TBD
SAR 80722
TBD
SAR 1130
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.06 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.82
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.76
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 61.74
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 82.32
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 264.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 352.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3219.3
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4292.4
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170
210 km/h
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
1318
/
17
/
5
/
4430
4574 mm
1818
1876 mm
1635
1685 mm
2610
2720 mm
359/1166
463 L
145
/
Fuel Economy
15.9
12.2 Km/L
45
55 L
/
12.2 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Smart Key
/
Manual
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
Front Row Seats
/
Passenger Seat
/
Leather
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Safety
Drivers and Passenger Airbag Side Airbags
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
10.1
/
✓
/
✓
/
6
/
Transmission
CVT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Drive
Front Wheel Drive
McPherson Front Shock Absorber
/
H Torsional Beam
/
Wheels/brakes
Disc
/
Disc
/
215/55 R17
/
215/55 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
1.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
168
231 BHP
/
360 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
