CarteaCompare Cars06 Hyper Pro vs H6 Active

06 Hyper Pro vs H6 Active Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Positive

  • Modern interior and exterior design
  • High fuel efficiency;
  • Advanced security technologies

Negative

  • Mediocre engine performance at high speeds
  • The comfort of the seats is not optimal for long distances
  • Availability of spare parts may be limited in some areas

Price Comparison

SAR 93460

SAR 93460

SAR 89900

SAR 89900

SAR 1258

SAR 1258

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.07 L/KM

0.07 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

SAR 10.29

Daily Fule Payment

SAR 10.29

Weekly Fule Payment

SAR 72.03

Weekly Fule Payment

SAR 72.03

Monthly Fule Payment

SAR 308.7

Monthly Fule Payment

SAR 308.7

Yearly Fule Payment

SAR 3755.85

Yearly Fule Payment

SAR 3755.85

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

Engine / Motor

4

/

/

/

Dimensions

Flush Door

/

5

5

4350

/

1820

/

1625

/

2640

/

Fuel Economy

15

14.9 km/L

51

/

Comfort

/

/

Yes

Interior

10.25

10.25 Inch

Dual

/

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

6

4

/

No

/

/

/

es

/

Yes

/

Yes

/

Yes

/

Yes

/

Yes

Infotainment

12.3

/

/

6

8 + DTS

/

/

Transmission

7DCT

7DCT

Chassis & Steering

/

Front Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

225/60 R18

/

225/60 R18

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

L

/

1.5 L

2.0L

Gasoline

Gasoline

Turbocharge

Turbocharge

4

4

181 BHP

201 HP @ 6000-6300 rpm

133

105

5500

/

290

320 Nm @ 1500-4000 rpm

2000-3500

/

/

Turbocharged

/

DOHC

Technologies

/

/

/

Yes

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Yes

Popular Car Comparisons

Lynk & Co | 06 Hyper Pro

VS

JAC | JS6 Comfort

Lynk & Co | 06 Hyper Pro

VS

Lynk & Co | 06 Hyper Pro

Lynk & Co | 06 Hyper Pro

VS

Haval | H6 Active

Lynk & Co | 06 Hyper Pro

VS

Hyundai | Tucson Comfort 1.6L

Lynk & Co | 06 Hyper Pro

VS

Mazda | Mazda CX30 2021 2.0L Classic 4x2

Lynk & Co Related Car

Haval Related Car

Haval Related New Car