T01 Adventurer vs Sportage Smartstream 2.0L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern design and comfortable cabin
- Spacious interior and comfortable seating
- Comprehensive intelligent technology and specifications
Negative
- Poor performance at high speeds
- The transmission response is slow when accelerating
- Internal materials need to be improved
Price Comparison
SAR 127048
SAR 102970
SAR 122237
SAR 99046
SAR 1710
SAR 1386
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 397.27
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
220 km/h
/
4
/
1998 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
2150
/
17"
/
4705
4515 mm
1895
865 mm
1936
1650 mm
2860
2680 mm
1598
/
1598
/
235
/
40
/
36
/
23.6
/
/
4 Doors
/
591 L
Fuel Economy
9.1
12 Km/L
80
54 L
/
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
Interior
Front Row Seats
/
10.25-inch
/
Driver Seat
✓
Driver Seat
✓
Driver Seat
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
Front
/
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Single
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
Safety
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3-inch
8
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
Transmission
8AT
/
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
5-Link Rigid Axle Suspension
/
5-Link Rigid Axle Suspension
/
Exterior
كهربائي
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
2.0L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Turbocharge
/
248 BHP
152 BHP
410
192 Nm
/
In-Line
/
4
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
• Standard • Economic • Sport • Snow • Sand • Rock • Mud • Wade • Mountain • Uneven
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
-Photoroom.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
