212 Adventure vs Tucson Comfort 1.6L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Positive
- Modern and attractive interior and exterior design
- Excellent riding comfort and stable driving experience
- Availability of advanced security and assistance technologies
Negative
- Internal details and quality of materials need to be improved
- Engine response and noise at high speeds
- Storage space is limited as much as
Price Comparison
SAR 127048
SAR 93393
SAR 122237
SAR 89865
SAR 1710
SAR 1257
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.11 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 384.45
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 314.55
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
200 km/h
/
4
/
1596 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
2150
/
4705
4500 mm
1895
1865 mm
1936
1650 mm
2860
2680 mm
1598
/
1598
/
235
210 m
40
/
36
/
23.6
/
/
4 Doors
/
620 L
Fuel Economy
9.1
11 Km/L
80
54 L
/
11 Km/L
Comfort
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
Keyless Entry
/
✔
Interior
/
✔
/
Fabric
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
Manual
/
✔
/
✔
/
Standard
/
✔
Safety
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Infotainment
/
10.25
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
Android LCD
/
✔
/
6
Transmission
AT
/
Chassis & Steering
/
Front Wheel Drive
Engine
2.0
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
248 BHP
177 BHP
410
264 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
Exterior
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
LED
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
Technologies
/
✔
/
✔
/
✔
