300 Challenger 2.0T vs Lynk & Co 09 2024 2.0T Hyper Pro (AWD) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 149327
SAR 205128
SAR 143635
SAR 197338
SAR 2010
SAR 2761
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 361.15
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
215
4
4
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4760 mm
5042
1930 mm
1977
1927 mm
1780
2750 mm
2984
400 L
/
224 m
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
12.7
75 L
/
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
254 BHP
387 Nm
350
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
