300 Challenger 2.0T vs Outlander 2.5L GLX Mid Line Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Positive
- Spacious interior space
- Integrated specifications
- Competitive price value
Negative
- Engine performance is moderate
- Limited driving experience
- Traditional interior design
Price Comparison
SAR 149327
SAR 102447
SAR 143635
SAR 98531
SAR 2010
SAR 1379
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 349.5
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 244.65
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
/
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4760 mm
4709 mm
1930 mm
1897 mm
1927 mm
1745 mm
2750 mm
2705 mm
400 L
331 L
224 m
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
14.7 Km/L
75 L
55 L
10 Km/L
14.7 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
/
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
181 BHP
387 Nm
245 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
