300 Challenger 2.0T vs Sportage Smartstream 2.0L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Positive
- Modern design and comfortable cabin
- Spacious interior and comfortable seating
- Comprehensive intelligent technology and specifications
Negative
- Poor performance at high speeds
- The transmission response is slow when accelerating
- Internal materials need to be improved
Price Comparison
SAR 149327
SAR 102970
SAR 143635
SAR 99046
SAR 2010
SAR 1386
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 349.5
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 279.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
220 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
1998 cc
Chinese
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
4 Doors
4760 mm
4515 mm
1930 mm
865 mm
1927 mm
1650 mm
2750 mm
2680 mm
400 L
591 L
224 m
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
12 Km/L
75 L
54 L
10 Km/L
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Single
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12.3
8
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
9
8
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
4
224 BHP
152 BHP
387 Nm
192 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
