300 Challenger 2.0T vs Toyota Rav4 2023 2.0L LE 2WD Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption with strong performance
- Spacious and practical interior space
- Reliability and quality of safety equipment
Negative
- The suspension is a bit stiff
- Use of lower quality interior materials
- Less control of internal noise
Price Comparison
SAR 149327
SAR 101630
SAR 143635
SAR 97750
SAR 2010
SAR 1368
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 349.5
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 314.55
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200
4
4
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
/
4760 mm
4600
1930 mm
1855
1927 mm
1685
2750 mm
2690
400 L
1085
224 m
/
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
11.1
75 L
55
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Keyless Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
170 BHP
387 Nm
207
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
