300 Challenger 2.0T vs TXL Comfort 1.6T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 149327
TBD
SAR 143635
TBD
SAR 2010
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.1 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.65
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 81.55
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 349.5
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 209.7
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4252.25
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
200 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
1598 cc
Chinese
Chinese
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4760 mm
4780 mm
1930 mm
1885 mm
1927 mm
1730 mm
2750 mm
2800 mm
400 L
450 L
224 m
200 m
Fuel Economy
10 Km/L
16 Km/L
75 L
50 L
10 Km/L
16 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Keyless Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Leather
Leather
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
Dual Zone
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12.3
12.3
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
9
8
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Four Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
1.6 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Twin Turbo
4
4
224 BHP
290 BHP
387 Nm
400 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
