300 Conqueror vs Chery Tiggo 8 Pro Max 2023 2.0T Flagship Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 164857
SAR 142496
SAR 158585
SAR 137080
SAR 2219
SAR 1918
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.07 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 11.52
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.08
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 80.64
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 70.56
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 345.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 302.4
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4204.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3679.2
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
/
4
4
1998 cc
/
Chinese
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
/
4760
4722
1930
1860
1927
1705
2750
2710
400 L
/
224
/
Fuel Economy
12.1
14.9
75 L
/
10 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
12.3
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
/
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
LED
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.0 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
/
4
/
224 BHP
254 BHP
387 Nm
390
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
