300 Conqueror vs Prado TXR 2.4T Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Robust and distinctive exterior design
- High off road driving capabilities
- Advanced technology and comprehensive security systems
Negative
- Relatively high fuel consumption
- Limited interior space for rear seats
- Less efficient performance on highways
Positive
- Strong performance in rough terrain
- Reliability and durability
- Spacious and comfortable interior
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High maintenance and repair costs
- Traditional interior design
Price Comparison
SAR 164857
SAR 212120
SAR 158585
SAR 204097
SAR 2219
SAR 2855
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.08 L/KM
0.09 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 10.49
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 73.4
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 325.04
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3827.03
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
180 km/h
4
4
1998 cc
2393 cc
Chinese
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
7 Seater
5 Doors
5 Doors
4760
4925 mm
1930
1980 mm
1927
1925 mm
2750
2850 mm
400 L
104 L
224
221 m
Fuel Economy
12.1
10.6 Km/L
75 L
110 L
10 Km/L
10.6 Km/L
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Smart Entry
Keyless Entry
✓
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
Fabric
Digital
Digital
Dual Zone
3-Zone
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Electric
Electric
✓
✓
✓
✓
Standard
Standard
✓
/
Safety
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Infotainment
12.3
8
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
Android LCD
Android LCD
✓
✓
9
6
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Four-Wheel Drive
Four Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
265/65 R17
/
265/65 R17
/
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
LED
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Engine
In-Line
In-Line
2.0 L
2.4 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
Single Turbo
Single Turbo
4
4
224 BHP
267 BHP
387 Nm
430 Nm
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
