Alsvin Full Option vs K8 2.5L GDI Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Competitive price compared to competitors
- Low fuel consumption
- Advanced technical features for its class
Negative
- Limited internal space
- Material quality can be improved
- Engine performance is limited on highways
Positive
- Modern and luxurious interior design
- Optimal performance and economical fuel consumption
- Security system and advanced technologies
Negative
- The price is higher than some competitors
- Slightly limited rear legroom
- Difficulty in the availability of some custom options
Price Comparison
SAR 48887
TBD
SAR 47035
TBD
SAR 658
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.08 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.32
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 65.24
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 288.92
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3401.8
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
4
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
14
/
4
/
4390
5015 mm
1725
1875 mm
1468
1455 mm
2535
2895 mm
/
510 L
Fuel Economy
/
12 Km/L
45
64 L
/
12 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
/
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
Safety
/
/
2
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
✓
Infotainment
10.25
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
✓
/
4
/
Transmission
DCT
/
5
/
DCT
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Exterior
Chrome
/
Electric
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
105 BHP
198 BHP
145
248 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
/
✓
/
