CarteaCompare CarsASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option vs MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort

ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option vs MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort Comparison

Review Comparison

Positive

  • Attractive and striking exterior design
  • Economical fuel consumption
  • Reliable and consistent performance

Negative

  • The space of the rear seats is limited
  • The infotainment system is outdated
  • Limited engine choices

Positive

  • No data found

Negative

  • No data found

Price Comparison

SAR 84918

SAR 88183

SAR 81688

SAR 84812

SAR 1143

SAR 1187

Fuel Consumption Comparison

0.08 L/KM

0.08 L/KM

Daily Fule Payment

SAR 11.76

Daily Fule Payment

SAR 11.76

Weekly Fule Payment

SAR 82.32

Weekly Fule Payment

SAR 82.32

Monthly Fule Payment

SAR 352.8

Monthly Fule Payment

SAR 352.8

Yearly Fule Payment

SAR 4292.4

Yearly Fule Payment

SAR 4292.4

Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day

Hide common specs

Car Information

Engine / Motor

193 km/h

210

/

4

Dimensions

5 Seater

5 Seater

4355 mm

4.574

1810 mm

1.876

1625 mm

1.685

2670 mm

2.720

358 L

463

Fuel Economy

12.5 Km/L

12.2

63 L

55

12.5 Km/L

/

Comfort

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Interior

/

/

/

/

/

Safety

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Infotainment

/

/

/

/

/

/

Transmission

/

/

Automatic

Chassis & Steering

Front Wheel Drive

Front Wheel Drive

Wheels/brakes

/

Exterior

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

/

Engine

2.0 L

2.0 L

Gasoline

Petrol

150 BHP

231 BHP

197 Nm

360

Technologies

/

/

/

/

/

Popular Car Comparisons

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Haval | Haval Jolion 2023 1.5T Active Plus

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Lynk & Co | 06 Core Plus

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

Hyundai | Hyundai Santa Fe 2018 2.4L FWD

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

MG | MG HS 2020 2.0T Comfort

Mitsubishi | ASX 2.0L GLX (2WD) Mid Option

VS

MG | RX5 1.5T STD

Mitsubishi Related Car

MG Related Car