Attrage 1.2 GLS vs Toyota Yaris Sedan 2023 1.3L Y (CVT) Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Low fuel consumption
- Low maintenance cost
- Easy maneuverability in the city
Negative
- Engine performance is modest
- Limited internal quality
- Insufficient noise insulation
Positive
- Economical in fuel consumption
- Driving comfort and steering
- High reliability
Negative
- Limited storage space
- The performance of the sound insulation system is average
- Engine power is limited
Price Comparison
SAR 39217
SAR 64929
SAR 37682
SAR 62445
SAR 528
SAR 874
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.05 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 7.2
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 7.2
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 50.4
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 50.4
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 201.6
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 201.6
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2628
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2628
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
170 km/h
175
/
4
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4245 mm
4425
1670 mm
1740
1515 mm
1480
2550 mm
2500
450 L
/
Fuel Economy
20 Km/L
19.6
42 L
42
20 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
2
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
✓
✓
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
CVT
/
✓
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
MacPherson strut with stabilizer
/
Torsion beam
/
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
Disc (ventilated)
/
Drum (leading & trailing)
/
185/55R15
/
185/55R15
/
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.2 L
1.3 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
76 BHP
97 BHP
100 Nm
122
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
