Camry 2.5L Limited HEV (215 HP) vs Dodge Charger 2023 3.6L GT Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Excellent fuel efficiency
- High level of security
- Driving comfort and modern technology
Negative
- A higher price than competitors
- The availability of spare parts may be limited
- Limited storage space compared to some
Positive
- Amazing power and acceleration
- Unique American muscular design
- Pleasant driving experience and excellent control
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- The quality of interior materials is average
- Suspension comfort is not ideal
Price Comparison
SAR 151632
SAR 217026
SAR 145858
SAR 208826
SAR 2041
SAR 2921
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.05 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 5.83
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 40.78
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 174.75
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 384.45
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2126.13
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
200 km/h
210
4
6
2490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4885 mm
5040
1840 mm
1905
1445 mm
1479
2824 mm
3052
493 L
455
Fuel Economy
22.2 Km/L
9.3
50 L
70
22.2 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Smart Entry
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
Dual Zone
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
/
✓
/
/
Driver Seat
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
Android LCD
/
✓
/
8
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
In-Line
/
2.5 L
3.6 L
Hybrid
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
215 BHP
300 BHP
221 Nm
358
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
