Camry 2.5L S+ (204 HP) vs E300 3.0L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 104012
SAR 462649
SAR 100058
SAR 445141
SAR 1400
SAR 6227
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.07 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 8.16
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 57.09
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 244.65
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 384.45
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2976.58
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
195 km/h
260 km/h
/
4
/
2998 cc
/
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
4885 mm
4949 mm
1840 mm
1880 mm
1445 mm
1480 mm
2824 mm
2961 mm
493 L
540 L
Fuel Economy
14.9 Km/L
9 Km/L
60 L
66 L
14.9 Km/L
9 Km/L
Comfort
/
✓
Interior
/
✓
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
2.5 L
3.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
204 BHP
285 BHP
243 Nm
420 Nm
/
In-Line
/
Single Turbo
/
4
