Camry 3.5L 40th Anniversary (298 HP) vs E300 3.0L Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 142123
SAR 462649
SAR 136711
SAR 445141
SAR 1913
SAR 6227
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.14 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 16.31
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 12.82
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 114.17
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 89.71
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 489.3
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 384.45
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5953.15
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 4677.48
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
235 km/h
260 km/h
6
4
3490 cc
2998 cc
GCC
GCC
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
4885 mm
4949 mm
1840 mm
1880 mm
1445 mm
1480 mm
2824 mm
2961 mm
427 L
540 L
Fuel Economy
7 Km/L
9 Km/L
60 L
66 L
7 Km/L
9 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Leather
✓
Digital
Digital
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
✓
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Infotainment
9
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
✓
✓
/
9
✓
Transmission
Automatic
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
LED
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
V
In-Line
3.5 L
3.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
Single Turbo
4
4
298 BHP
285 BHP
356 Nm
420 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
