Camry 3.5L 40th Anniversary (298 HP) vs G70 2.0T Premium Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Positive
- No data found
Negative
- No data found
Price Comparison
SAR 142123
SAR 180384
SAR 136711
SAR 173519
SAR 1913
SAR 2428
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.14 L/KM
0.1 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 20.16
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 14.4
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 141.12
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 100.8
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 564.48
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 403.2
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 7358.4
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5256
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
235 km/h
240 km/h
6
/
3490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
4 Doors
4885 mm
4685 mm
1840 mm
1850 mm
1445 mm
1400 mm
2824 mm
2835 mm
427 L
/
Fuel Economy
7 Km/L
10.4 Km/L
60 L
60 L
7 Km/L
10.4 Km/L
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
/
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
/
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Infotainment
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
Transmission
Automatic
/
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Rear Wheel Drive
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Engine
V
/
3.5 L
2.0 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
298 BHP
252 BHP
356 Nm
360 Nm
Technologies
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
