Camry 3.5L 40th Anniversary (298 HP) vs Nissan Altima 2023 2.5 S Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Reliability and durability of high performance
- Riding comfort and roomy interior design
- Fuel efficiency and low maintenance costs
Negative
- Driving performance lacks enthusiasm
- Traditional exterior and interior design
- Lack of sportsmanship in control
Positive
- Excellent driving comfort
- Economical fuel efficiency
- Advanced security systems
Negative
- Average motive power performance
- Improvement of internal materials
- Noise insulation needs to be developed
Price Comparison
SAR 142123
SAR 115894
SAR 136711
SAR 111470
SAR 1913
SAR 1560
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0.14 L/KM
0.06 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 16.31
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 6.99
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 114.17
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 48.93
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 505.61
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 216.69
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 5953.15
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 2551.35
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
235 km/h
220
6
4
3490 cc
/
GCC
/
Dimensions
5 Seater
5 Seater
4 Doors
/
4885 mm
4869
1840 mm
1850
1445 mm
1440
2824 mm
2825
427 L
517
Fuel Economy
7 Km/L
15.9
60 L
61.3
7 Km/L
/
Comfort
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
✓
✓
Leather
/
Digital
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
Electric
/
✓
/
✓
✓
Standard
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
9
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Android LCD
/
✓
/
9
/
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
Automatic
CVT
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
Front Wheel Drive
Wheels/brakes
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
LED
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
Engine
V
/
3.5 L
2.5 L
Gasoline
Gasoline
None
/
4
/
298 BHP
188 BHP
356 Nm
244
Technologies
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
.png?x-oss-process=image/format,webp/interlace,1/quality,q_70/resize,w_750)
