Captiva LS vs Toyota Land Cruiser 2024 3.3T GX DSL Comparison
Review Comparison
Positive
- Economical fuel consumption
- Comfortable and spacious interior space
- Competitive price for specifications
Negative
- Average engine performance
- The quality of interior materials need to improve
- A feature limited entertainment system
Positive
- Powerful off-road capabilities
- Exceptional reliability and durability
- Interior comfort and luxury equipment
Negative
- High fuel consumption
- High purchase and maintenance costs
- Limitations in maneuvering due to heavy weight
Price Comparison
SAR 79340
TBD
SAR 76300
TBD
SAR 1068
TBD
Fuel Consumption Comparison
0 L/KM
0.11 L/KM
Daily Fule Payment
/
Daily Fule Payment
SAR 9.13
Weekly Fule Payment
/
Weekly Fule Payment
SAR 63.91
Monthly Fule Payment
/
Monthly Fule Payment
SAR 283.03
Yearly Fule Payment
/
Yearly Fule Payment
SAR 3332.45
Calculating the fuel price based on 50KM/Day
Hide common specs
Car Information
Engine / Motor
/
6
Dimensions
7 Seater
7 Seater
18
/
1051L
/
/
5115
/
1980
/
1920
Fuel Economy
/
9.3
/
110
Comfort
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
Smart Key
/
Manual
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Interior
3.5
/
✓
/
diagonal display
/
Front Row Seats
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Safety
2 Front and sides
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Infotainment
10.4
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
4
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Transmission
CVT
Automatic
Chassis & Steering
Front Wheel Drive
All Wheel Drive
Mcpherson
/
/
✓
Wheels/brakes
✓
/
✓
/
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Exterior
✓
/
✓
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
HALOGEN
/
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
Engine
1.5 L
3.3 L
Gasoline
Diesel
144 BHP
304 BHP
/
700
Technologies
✓
/
✓
✓
Manual
/
✓
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
/
✓
